Luvo AI vs CrushOn AI
Every figure checked 30 August 2026 · TECHIEPIE LTD, Nicosia, Cyprus
The short version
Our verdict: it dependsCrushOn sells conversation by the message. Their ladder runs from 100 message credits a month on the free tier to 125,000 on the top one, through six named tiers, with separate purchasable "chat packages" on top — the Pro Models package is $39.99 a month or $299.99 a year against a $479.88 comparison.
We do not sell messages at all. Chat is unlimited on every Luvo tier including free, and what we meter is photographs. So the comparison is not a price comparison: it is whether the thing you want rationed is the talking or the pictures.
The line on their free tier worth knowing before you start: "Chat History will be deleted after 7 days of inactivity." It is stated plainly on their own pricing page, which is more than most products do, and it is the kind of term that matters much more than a dollar.
What a month costs, per message
| Plan | Per month | Messages |
|---|---|---|
| CrushOn Free | $0.00 | 100 |
| CrushOn Standard | not published | 2,000 |
| CrushOn Premium | not published | 6,000 |
| CrushOn Luxe | not published | 20,000 |
| Luvo Freeunlimited chat, 10 photographs | $0.00 | unlimited |
| Luvo Plus, annualunlimited chat, 160 photographs | $7.99 | unlimited |
There is no price-per-message column on this page because the prices that would fill it are not published where a signed-out visitor can read them. CrushOn AI meters messages carefully; what it charges for them is the part we could not check.
- Their per-tier prices are not in this table and the rows say so. Their pricing page rendered the same $39.99 figure against every tier to a signed-out browser, which is plainly a display fault rather than the real ladder, and printing a number we could see was wrong would be worse than leaving it out.
- The credit counts are theirs and they did render distinctly: 100, 2,000, 6,000, 20,000, 55,000 and 125,000 message credits a month across the six tiers.
- The one price we could read cleanly is the Pro Models chat package — $39.99 a month, $24.99 a month on a year, billed $299.99 against a $479.88 comparison. It sits on top of a membership rather than replacing one.
What free gets you
100 message credits a month, unlimited access to their free models, 8K memory, 200 messages of history per character, no group chat, and chat history deleted after seven days of inactivity. Luvo's free tier is unlimited chat, one girl and 10 photographs a month, and nothing is deleted for going quiet.
Two different things to ration
Every product in this category has to ration something, because everything costs money to serve. The interesting question is which thing, and the two answers produce completely different products.
CrushOn rations messages and gives away the model tiers below the good one. That makes sense if your users are there to write — long roleplay, group scenes, thousands of turns — and the expensive resource is inference on a large model with a long context.
We ration photographs and give away conversation, because a month of heavy chat costs us about three cents and a single realistic photograph costs about three cents on its own. If your evening is mostly talking, ours is free and theirs is metered. If it is mostly looking, the reverse.
The seven-day line
"Chat History will be deleted after 7 days of inactivity" is on the free tier of their own pricing page. On the paid tiers it becomes "Chat History is kept during the Membership Period" — so it is kept while you are paying and not after.
We would rather they printed it than not, and they did. It is also worth understanding what it means: on a free account, a week away is the relationship. On a paid account, the history is a subscription benefit rather than something you own.
Luvo keeps conversation memory on the conversation and does not expire it for inactivity. That is a promise about behaviour today rather than a legal commitment, and if it ever changes this page should change with it.
Where CrushOn AI is better
Memory, on every axis. Up to 16K memory models, 600 messages of history per character, auto-summarisation with a re-summarise control, and up to 5,000 characters of pinned context per chat. We have one running summary and no controls over it.
Group chats, concurrent chats with the same character, and a message length you can adjust up to 450 characters — none of which exists on our side. Their custom voice slots let you bring a voice; we have twelve to pick from and no way to add a thirteenth.
A model ladder — free, Pro and Ultra tiers with an unlimited Pro package on top — so a heavy writer can buy their way to a better model. We run one model and you get it.
Six tiers, so the ladder actually fits people. We have two.
What we could not check
Every one of these products puts its checkout behind a signup. Where a number was not readable without an account, it is listed here rather than taken from a review site that earns a commission on the answer.
- The per-tier subscription prices. Their page did not render them correctly to a signed-out browser and we will not print a figure we watched fail to load.
- What a message credit costs on a Pro or Ultra model, which is where the credits actually go.
- The billing descriptor.
Same girl, anywhere
Four shoots of Vera — different clothes, different city, different weather. Nothing re-rolled: every one is an edit of the first.
Those four cost four credits. Run the same test on CrushOn AI — both products have a free tier — and put the faces side by side. If ours does not hold up, none of the arithmetic above matters and you should ignore this page.
CrushOn AI against the others
Head-to-heads we are not in. Same rules, and the verdict names one of the two.
Other comparisons
- Luvo AI vs Character.AI$9.99 a month to wait less. No adult content, no photographs — a different product, not a cheaper one.
- Luvo AI vs PepHop AI$4.99 for 2,000 messages. Three tiers, one unit, no conversion table — the clearest page in the set.
- Luvo AI vs Backyard AI$12 or $35 a month, and they tell you which open models you are talking to.