Luvo

Alternatives

19 comparisons against the apps people actually weigh us against, with the arithmetic shown, the parts they do better written down, and every figure carrying the date it was checked and a link to the page it came from.

Every one of them says what the other product does better, and what we could not check without an account. That is not politeness. A comparison that only reads one way is a comparison nobody has any reason to believe, and believability is the only thing a page like this has to sell.

$0.047
a photograph on our best plan. The middle of this category is $0.100.
7 of 9
comparisons where both sides publish enough to price a photograph, and ours is the lower price. The two it is not, we wrote up anyway.
1 credit
a photograph, whatever it is of. No tokens, no coins, and no better model that quietly costs double.

Companion apps

The products people are actually choosing between: a girl, a chat, and pictures of her. These are the comparisons where the arithmetic matters, because both sides are selling the same thing.

Chat-first products

Built around conversation rather than pictures. They rank on the same searches and they are not the same purchase — every page here says so in its first paragraph rather than pretending a chat product lost a photograph comparison.

Image and video generators

Sold as tools rather than companions. The closest to a like-for-like comparison in the set, because a render is a render and both sides can count them.

The ones we have not written, and why

Several of these have more search volume than pages in the list above. Every one of them keeps its price behind a signup, so the only way to publish the comparison would be to quote an affiliate-funded review site — and one search for a single competitor’s price returns three different figures from three such sites, each of them earning a commission on the answer. A page built on that is a page they discredit in one reply.

Replika
Pro pricing is inside the app and their help centre no longer states a figure. The Play Store listing shows an in-app purchase ceiling and not the subscription rate.
Nomi.ai
No public pricing page — nomi.ai/pricing and /faq both 404, and the plans are behind the app. Conversational voice and memory are the two places we are genuinely behind — we have voice notes and they hold a conversation — so this is the page we most want to write.
Janitor AI
Free to use and largely powered by keys you bring yourself, so there is no subscription to compare. A page about it would be about proxies and rate limits, not price.
SpicyChat
Every pricing route we tried returns their not-found page to a signed-out browser.
Kindroid
No price rendered to a signed-out browser on any route we found.
Muah.AI
The pricing route redirects into a sign-in flow before showing a figure.
Kupid AI
Their pricing paths 404 and the only figure on the site is a top-up pack in euros with no unit attached.
Seduced
Their plan grid publishes image ceilings — 300, 750 and 2,250 — and no prices to a signed-out browser. Half a comparison is not a comparison.
FantasyGF, HeraHaven, Joyland, Talkie, Chub, Caveduck
Same reason in each case: no price legible without an account, on any route we could find.

If you have a screenshot of a checkout for any of them, send it and the page gets written. That is the whole bar.

And the ones we are not in

Candy AI vs DreamGF. Character.AI vs CrushOn. SoulGen vs Promptchan. Head-to-heads between the other apps, on the same terms — both price lists, what each publishes and hides, and a verdict naming one of the two. We are one line near the bottom of each.

See the head-to-heads